* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *   IN THE MATTER OF: UVEST FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. (CRD No. 13787) ("Respondent") * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * *

CONSENT ORDER No. CO-12-8021-S

WHEREAS, the Banking Commissioner (“Commissioner”) is charged with the administration of Chapter 672a of the General Statutes of Connecticut, the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (“Act”), and Sections 36b-31-2 to 36b-31-33, inclusive, of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies promulgated under the Act (“Regulations”);

WHEREAS, UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc. (“UVEST”), now or formerly of 5 Coliseum Centre, 2810 Coliseum Centre Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28217, was registered as a broker-dealer under the Act from October 28, 1996 to May 21, 2012 when, following its filing of a May 17, 2012 Form BDW, the firm's broker-dealer registration was withdrawn in Connecticut;

WHEREAS, state regulators from multiple jurisdictions, including the Securities and Business Investments Division of the State of Connecticut Department of Banking (the “Division”) conducted coordinated investigations of Bankers Life and Casualty Company (“Bankers Life”) and BLC Financial Services, Inc. (CRD number 126638) (“BLCFS”) (collectively, “Bankers”) to determine whether Bankers should have been registered as a broker-dealer and investment adviser between January 1, 2005, and December 2, 2011;

WHEREAS, the investigations revealed that Bankers had acted as a broker-dealer and investment adviser in various jurisdictions without being registered, exempt from registration, or a federal covered investment adviser, and had employed or otherwise engaged agents and investment adviser representatives who were not so registered on behalf of Bankers;

WHEREAS, UVEST entered into an agreement with Bankers to provide brokerage and investment advisory services out of Bankers Life branch office locations;

WHEREAS, Bankers has engaged in similar conduct in Connecticut in violation of Section 36b-6 of the Act;

WHEREAS, Section 36b-27(a) of the Act authorizes the Commissioner to order any person who has violated, is violating or is about to violate any provision of the Act or any regulation, rule or order adopted or issued under the Act, and any person who has materially aided in such violation, to cease and desist from such violation, and Section 36b-27(d) of the Act authorizes the Commissioner to impose a fine against any person who has violated any provision of the Act or any regulation, rule or order adopted or issued under the Act, and against any person who has materially aided in such violation;

WHEREAS, aiding a violation of the Act would also support the initiation of administrative proceedings under Section 36b-15(a)(2)(M) of the Act;

WHEREAS, an administrative proceeding under Sections 36b-15 and 36b-27 of the Act would constitute a “contested case” within the meaning of Section 4-166(2) of the General Statutes of Connecticut;

WHEREAS, Section 4-177(c) of the General Statutes of Connecticut and Section 36a-1-55(a) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies provide that a contested case may be resolved by consent order, unless precluded by law;

WHEREAS, Section 36b-31(a) of the Act provides, in relevant part, that “[t]he commissioner may from time to time make . . . such . . . orders as are necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 36b-2 to 36b-34, inclusive”;

WHEREAS, Section 36b-31(b) of the Act provides, in relevant part, that “[n]o . . . order may be made . . . unless the commissioner finds that the action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors and consistent with the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of sections 36b-2 to 36b-34, inclusive”;

WHEREAS, the conduct addressed herein has resulted in no known direct consumer harm, and the parties understand that registered agents or representatives of UVEST participated in all securities transactions;

WHEREAS, UVEST has cooperated with state regulators conducting the investigations by responding to inquiries and providing documentary evidence;

WHEREAS, UVEST has ceased operations as a going concern and is in the process of winding down its business;

WHEREAS, UVEST, in order to avoid protracted and expensive proceedings in numerous states, has agreed to resolve the investigations through a multistate settlement which includes this Consent Order;

WHEREAS, UVEST, without admitting or denying the Conclusions of Law set forth below and solely for the purposes of this Consent Order, admits the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, admits the Findings of Fact set forth below, voluntarily consents to the entry of this Consent Order, and voluntarily waives the following rights:  (1) to be afforded notice and an opportunity for a hearing within the meaning of Sections 36b-15(f), 36b-27(a) and 36b-27(d)(2) of the Act and Section 4-177(a) of the General Statutes of Connecticut; (2) to present evidence and argument and to otherwise avail itself of Sections 36b-15(f), 36b-27(a) and 36b-27(d)(2) of the Act and Section 4-177c(a) of the General Statutes of Connecticut; (3) to present its position in a hearing in which it is represented by counsel; (4) to have a written record of the hearing made and a written decision issued by a hearing officer; and (5) to seek judicial review of, or otherwise challenge or contest the matters described herein, including the validity of this Consent Order;

WHEREAS, the Commissioner finds that the entry of this Consent Order is necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors and consistent with the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act;

NOW THEREFORE, the Commissioner hereby enters this Consent Order.